"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> GoldStar - Conference Full Report - Promoting good practice in managing volunteers from socially excluded groups
GoldStar - Promoting good practice in managing volunteers from socially excluded groups
Full Report
Date Event
23.06.2006 Goldstar Regional Conference
(East Midlands)
Number of Delegates Location
34 (click to view list) Walkers Stadium
Leicester

Format
1. Interviews with GoldStar Exemplar project managers
2. Workshops: Issues raised and discussed


Print this report iconPrint this report *
Close Window iconClose this window *

GoldStar Interviews

One of the GoldStar project managers provided a number of insights into how volunteers are recruited and supported. He was:

What did they talk about?

Two key themes were addressed as part of the event, these being recruitment and selection and looking after volunteers.

Rob indicated that Cheetham Hill Advice Centre recruits about 15-20 volunteers a year. Training undertaken by volunteers is accredited.

Rob highlighted the ethnically diverse localities in which they operate, with about 20 different languages spoken locally. This presents particular challenges, with a significant amount spent on interpreters. However, he underlined that it was far better to have volunteers who speak different languages to fulfil this role. He emphasised how the Advice Centre has worked very hard to reach those communities represented locally.

In relation to looking after volunteers Rob highlighted the importance of supervision, with each volunteer having a supervisor each day that they work. He emphasised the holistic nature of support provided, with the role of a full time development worker being to provide ongoing support. Support provided may relate to the tasks being undertaken as a volunteer but equally may relate to issues volunteers are facing outside their volunteer role.

In relation to recruitment of volunteers, Rob commented, “Because we are training them to be volunteers we have quite a long recruitment process in terms of making sure what we offer is right for that person and then once they start, they are on a training course to begin with and also coming into the centre to put what they are learning into practice”.

The length of time courses can take and the commitment this can involve was identified as an issue, with one organisation indicating volunteers used to undertake seven and a half days training, but this has now been reduced, which has helped to attract more volunteers. One delegate indicated that within their own advice agency, training is spread over 9 months, costs over £2000, with an average attrition rate of 50%.

The issue of the image of different volunteer roles was also raised, with one delegate indicating that within their own organisation an image problem exists in relation to administrative volunteer roles. He indicated that this is an issue that needs to be addressed as, “all volunteers are valuable. If you take way administrative volunteers the whole system collapses”.

Rob indicated that within Cheetham Hill Advice Centre it used to be the case that administrative tasks were given to those not ready for advice, but this approach has now been changed to a policy of recruiting volunteers who specifically want to undertake administrative roles.

The issue of CRB checks was raised by one delegate. Rob indicated that Cheetham Hill Advice Centre do not CRB check volunteers, but do ask to declare any past issues. He indicated that although they rely on voluntary disclosure they can control some of the risk through other mechanisms such as references. It was pointed out that CRB checks should not be used as a substitute for good volunteer management.

A number of other issues were raised during the course of the event in relation to recruitment and selection, including:

The issue of how to deal with those potential volunteers considered unsuitable for particular roles was discussed with differences of opinion as to how this issue should be resolved emerging. While one delegate indicated that within their own organisation it was not the policy to turn down applicants, while another delegate pointed out that if you say no, it could be quite hurtful, but if you say yes, this can be even more problematic.

A wide range of examples of particular recruitment methods were identified by delegates. These are outlined more fully in the following section relating to workshops – Issues raised and discussed. However, two particular examples highlighted were:

In relation to looking after volunteers other issues raised included

2. Workshops. Issues raised and discussed

Delegates were asked to consider with colleagues sitting on their particular table, how they currently recruited volunteers, identify key barriers to recruitment and some lessons learnt in terms of recruitment and selection of volunteers, particularly those at risk from social exclusion. Delegates were also asked to identify key considerations in relation to looking after volunteers.

A summary of issues raised during these round table workshops is set out below:

Recruitment methods

A wide range of recruitment methods were identified, including:

Barriers to recruitment

Specific barriers to volunteer recruitment identified included:

Key recruitment lessons/considerations

A number of key recruitment lessons and considerations were identified including:

Looking after volunteers

A number of key issues and lessons were identified in relation to supporting volunteers including:

Information on current GoldStar Exemplar groups and good practices relating to volunteers from socially excluded groups are continually being uploaded onto this website throughout the GoldStar Dissemination programme.


Print this Report iconPrint this report *
Close Window iconClose this window *